On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <[email protected]> wrote: > I see. With my upstream hat on, I don't feel very comfortable with the > patch in its current form -- do you intend to send it to the Okular > developers?
well, that patch is absolutely wrong for upstream imho too > Do you all think it makes sense to contact the cups-base maintainer to > see if it's possible to add a lpr.cups or lpr-cups symlink? That way > Okular wouldn't need to be patched at all. is okular searching for those binaries too? then i'm ok with this solution. a quick search on google seems to suggest that lpr-cups is more standard, so if we have to choose i vote for this, btu dinoex@ might be comfortable with adding both, of course waiting for other's opinion -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <[email protected]> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
