On Saturday 09 of June 2012 21:09:21 Dwayne MacKinnon wrote: > > I was able to do some hacking to get kmail2 working for me. I keep meaning > to submit a bug report to ports... I 've discussed what I did here on the > list but a bug report would probably be best. (If you haven't seen it, > http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2012-May/013203.html ) > > I've put that read timeout to 8 hrs now. And I gotta say, with the database > connections staying stable I really, really like kmail2. It's quicker then > the old kmail. It's nice to have korganizer working again too.
Hi, I managed to get kmail2 working just fine now. I'm using external mysql (which is anyway installed) to setup akonadi database. It's gonna take some time(minutes to hours) depending how many mails you got in your kmail1 directory. Mine is around 50k, and it took only few minutes for akonadi to index it, but then virtuoso was doing its job...and it was much longer. If both backends don't finish their job folders in kmail just lags, or wont show ever, so be patient. Now it all looks promising. Kmail2 works very good, and it just needs little tweaking of old filters, and stuff. My setup is 9-stable, gcc4.2 from base, only cputype tweaked in make.conf. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
