Adriaan de Groot <[email protected]> writes: > So I'd like to reintroduce the PORTREVISIONS for these ports -- which are all > essentially unchanged from official ports -- so that they don't seem like a > downgrade. > > But there's an underlying question here: should trunk follow ports closely > except for the-ports-that-are-being-prepared-for-update, or not?
I agree with Alonso, and I'm glad you went ahead and already fixed this. Not setting PORTREVISION is/was a habit that predated my involvement with KDE on FreeBSD, and I can't think of any reason for continuing to do that trumps the inconveniences involved. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
