Am Montag, 18. Juli 2016, 10:07:03 schrieb Tobias C. Berner: > Moin moin > > I think I favor the creation of a new qt5-doc-globalfiles [or something > similar/sensible] port rather than adding them in qt5-core.
If the usage of two different distfiles causes too much pain, I'd also rather go with this solution than moving them to qt5-core. > > > mfg Tobias > > On 18 July 2016 at 00:02, Raphael Kubo da Costa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The reason is that tcberner and I want to re-work most of the qttools > > > > ports > > > > > that are currently split up into several ones to get them merged into as > > > > few > > > > > ports as possible and reasonable. Then look at the issue of the qdocconf > > > > files > > > > > again, if we open a bug report on Qt to have these files moved to > > > > qttools as > > > > > well, which would solve our problem at the source. > > > > I don't see how those two issues are related: moving the .qdocconf files > > to another port, be it a new one or qt5-core, does not prevent the > > creation of a qt5-tools port that just has to depend on it. > > _______________________________________________ > > kde-freebsd mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd > > See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information -- Kind regards, Ralf Nolden _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
