Le Mardi 4 Avril 2006 11:33, Kevin Krammer a écrit : > On Tuesday 04 April 2006 12:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Le Lundi 3 Avril 2006 20:51, Kevin Krammer a écrit : > > > Just a general question: do you plan to keep the KDEHW namespace name > > > or move to Solid, like Phonon has moved from KDEMM to Phonon? > > > > Well, I'm somewhat pondering. I tend to think there's nothing bad to have > > separate names for the sub-project and the librairies (and then > > namespaces). And in particular for a new developer not knowing Solid, > > kdehw might say something to him. But on the other hand Phonon named > > everything *phonon* and Plasma is doing the same... so it might be > > interesting to switch for consistency. > > > > Do you have something particular in mind while asking this? > > No important reason. I just noted that recent patches used KDEHW and that > Phonon changed away from KDEMM. > > I think Plasma is a bit different anyway, as it is not only a framework but > also a set of applications. Phonon and Solid are AFAIK just > framework/library.
No, Solid is a framework and a sets of applications like Plasma. But IMO, we should use Solid as namespace before I'm pretty sure that Marketing Group will use these projects names to promote KDE4. So a new app developer will first look for Solid and not KDEHW. -- Michaël Larouche (Shock The Dark Mage) KDE developer working on Kopete, Kamefu...on dial-up :P -------------------------------------- Blog: http://mlarouche.blogspot.com/ MSN/Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: irc.freenode.org/DarkShock on #kopete,#solid,#kamefu,#plasma Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
