On Monday 15 March 2010 23:53:08 Dario Freddi wrote: > On my todo list, IIRC, there is joining up powerdevil with solid::control. > I wanted to have a general ok and heads up before I actually step up and > write the whole stuff. Are we still ok with removing Solid::Control > completely? (I will probably write a blog post about it before starting > just to make everyone aware - some apps are probably linking to control).
Yes! Let me recap the reasoning: - Solid::Control was here to allow having different implementations of policy agents in the user session; - The fact is that there's really only one of those agents for each type (power, network, etc.) so there's no real advantage of exporting a lib; - If there's no need for a lib, we can just roll it back into each of the agents and make it disappear; - With the organization we have right now the policy itself is isolated in a kded module anyway so the system abstraction can be done there directly; - This way we can still have several competing ui so we don't loose that much. > Also, it looks like the meeting idea got lost in the wild - is there still > some interest around for it? See my previous mail in the relevant thread about that. > About the upower backend, as you see I'm starting to move. Excellent! Looking forward to it! Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
