On Wednesday 20 April 2011 23:07:39 David Hubner wrote: > I am looking to create a patch that would add a new public member to > show if a processor was 32bit or 64bit. It should be easy to add to the > udev backend, the hal backend would need some assembler[1]. I would > thinking calling the public member bool longMode();
Maybe an alternative would be extending the InstructionSets flag? This long mode has an impact on the instruction set or I'm mistaken? > The use case is mainly informational, see bug 271017. I can see other > use cases for it though. Which other use cases? > Is this something that would be OK to create a patch for and submit to the > solid reviewboard? Depends on the use cases really. If KInfoCenter is the only consumer of that it makes it less likely to make it to the API. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
