Cool :) If no objections arise within the next hours, I'll commit the change

2012/1/17 Alex Fiestas <[email protected]>:
> On 01/17/2012 05:17 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
>>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
>> inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
>> inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
>> change that to include also Screensaver inhibition, to provide a full
>> hassle-free experience screen-wise. What do you think? Anything
>> against/in favor of that?
>
>
> Totally in favor, I can't see a reason why somebody would want to inhibit
> DPMS and not screensaver.
_______________________________________________
Kde-hardware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel

Reply via email to