On 02/10/2011 02:14 AM, Duncan wrote: > Kevin Krammer posted on Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:38:08 +0100 as > excerpted: > > > On Thursday, 2011-02-10, James Tyrer wrote: > >> On 02/09/2011 08:14 AM, James Tyrer wrote: > >>> Well we are up to version 4.6 and I again ask: > >>> > >>> Is it really that hard to do this? [attached] > >> > >> Or this? [attached] > > > > You mean the full name of the week day? > > I took it to mean the digital look of the font (that the digital > clock should look... digital, like the old kde3 one did, IIRC),
That would be nice, but this is just a free font. > tho with just the image and nothing pointing out what bit he wants > the current one to look like it, that's simply a wild guess based on > the assumption that the digital clock follows the kcontrol/locale > date prefs, which given that he's a regular here, I figured he'd know > where to find. A user would make that presumption but it isn't correct. The date format does not follow the one set in System Settings. > But actually adding it so I can see and taking a look... it appears > that it /might/ follow the time prefs, but it does NOT follow either > the short or long date prefs! Correct. And there is no way for the clock to choose short or long. > I'd definitely call that a bug! Yes that would be bug *156360.* <http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156360> > Perhaps it should /optionally/ have > its own, but by default, it should be following the kcontrol locale > time and date prefs, probably with an option whether it should follow > the short or long version. Yes, and that would be bug 162368 which is where my demo patch was posted 2010-05-08 10:45 Bug 162368 is marked as fixed, but if it was, the fix is not in 4.6.0. -- James Tyrer Linux (mostly) From Scratch ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde-linux mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
