Dale posted on Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:04:38 -0600 as excerpted: >> Thanks for the followup. "I really otta" try krusader out some time, >> at least so I can know what I'm talking about when suggesting it as an >> alternative, even if I don't decide to keep it, but glad it's working >> for you, regardless. >> >> Question, tho: Is it still enough "kde" that it's better for kde than >> say some gtk-based file manager (say xfce's fileroller or the like, I >> /think/ fileroller is xfce...)? Because that's the other alternative I >> had thought about. But I figured krusader is still kde based so should >> fit in better on a kde desktop even if it is rather different than >> konqueror's file management mode or dolphin. Did I figure correctly? >> >> > > It is still KDEish. I didn't care if it was KDE or not but it does work > better. That's a plus. Besides, I had to try something. I'm bad to > open a file manager and forget to close it, we should be able to do that > on Linux without breaking something.
LOL. Yes, we should be able to do that without breaking something. And thanks. kde-ish might not be really necessary, but it's a plus. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde-linux mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
