[Please keep the NM list in CC:, otherwise I have to relay all questions. In fact, it's fine to just send to the NM list, I read that anyway.]
On Thursday 18 March 2010 23:46:25 maurus rohrer wrote: > > I can't really judge if this is a valid enough use case, or if in this > > case just a > > separate wallet should be used. In any event, it's not supported right > > now, so > > someone would need to implement it. In theory, any password can be "very > > confidential", and that's why kwallet stores them in an encrypted > > fashion. To me, > > this would mean that we'd need separate storage for any passwords as an > > option... > > I think if someone selects "always ask", he would be expecting NW to store > nothing in the wallet, just send the password over the bus to the daemon. > I just saw thats this issue is in the TO DO list. Do you know if someone is > working on this right now? Otherwise I would like to give it a try. If someone's working on it, then likely Will. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't mind you to have a go at it. Will can also give more details in case you've questions. > I also think that every password would need the storage type, and the > connection would needs a flag, telling if it should ask for passwords. Then > it should be the setting (ex. vpnsettings) it self knowing witch password, > has to be entered by the user. ? Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ kde-networkmanager mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-networkmanager
