Rex Dieter wrote: > On 06/01/2011 03:48 PM, Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote: > >> Yes, it should link because of ModemManager backend. But, of course, the >> nm09 branch stuff should not use the old networkmanager-0.7 backend. >> >> >> It seems for some reason your networkmanager-0.7 backend has higher >> priority than the networkmanager-0.9 backend. You can change that in >> systemsettings -> Infomation Source -> Network Manager Infrastructure >> (or something like that, my desktop is not in English). > > That was indeed that case, thanks!
With that in mind, wouldn't it be prudent, then, to bump the nm-0.9 provider's priority to be higher? say, using something like the attached patch... -- Rex
diff -up networkmanagement-0.9/solidcontrolfuture/solid/networkmanager-0.9/solid_networkmanager09.desktop.solid_priority networkmanagement-0.9/solidcontrolfuture/solid/networkmanager-0.9/solid_networkmanager09.desktop --- networkmanagement-0.9/solidcontrolfuture/solid/networkmanager-0.9/solid_networkmanager09.desktop.solid_priority 2011-06-01 08:32:49.000000000 -0500 +++ networkmanagement-0.9/solidcontrolfuture/solid/networkmanager-0.9/solid_networkmanager09.desktop 2011-06-02 09:54:22.346561620 -0500 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Type=Service X-KDE-ServiceTypes=SolidNetworkManager X-KDE-Library=solid_networkmanager09 -InitialPreference=100 +InitialPreference=101 Name=NetworkManager 0.9 Name[ar]=٠دÙر اÙشبÙØ© 0,9 Name[ast]=NetworkManager 0.9
_______________________________________________ kde-networkmanager mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-networkmanager
