On Sunday 12 October 2008, Paul Hummer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [Kde-scm-interest] distributed source control status': >What do you mean by "serious?" Bazaar can easily handle the distributed >workflow of KDE.
In my extremely limited experience with bazaar, I found that it performed poorly compared to git. I've also seen similar issues mentioned in other Internet discussions. There may have been great improvements made since then though. I don't recall any benchmarks I felt were solid proof that bazaar could or could not handle daily work with and maintenance of the KDE repository. I'd certainly not discourage anyone from trying to convert the KDE project to bazaar, but I would advise them that they'd have the same hurdles that any new VCS would. I'd also mention that Thiago and others have already put quite some work into getting Git ready to be KDE's new VCS [see Thomas' earlier email ITT), and it might be easier to built on that work (even if it's with another VCS) than to start from scratch. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
