On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: >> On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN", >> > can't I extend that to "We are loosing developers because of >> > CURRENT_VCS"? >> >> only if CURENT_VCS equals svn. What is your point? > > My point is that i don't see why "We are loosing developers because of SVN" is > ok and "We are loosing developers because of git" is not ok now or in 3 years
You've entirely lost me here. > and why we should not make the scripty system vcs agnostic now that we have > the 'chance'. Well decoupling parts of scripty from the VCS details is probably good design, just don't think it should be a feature goal. > P.S: I know git is the r00lz and will never be anything better than it but > there are some of us (stubborn in thiago notation) that still don't like it That's a pretty horrible reason to support multiple VCS's for the same project though. Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
