On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Albert Astals Cid<[email protected]> wrote: > A Dimarts, 21 de juliol de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Albert Astals Cid<[email protected]> wrote: >> > Why? Aren't we supposed to have the proper tools to avoid that? >> > >> > ftp://l10n.kde.org/logs/090720.trunk_l10n-kde4 >> > >> > Ok, it really didn't break but the error message about can't commit is >> > quite ugly. >> > >> > Albert >> >> Yea someone needs to tell scripty to use the Git repo instead if it >> isn't already. I really didn't know who to ask to do this. > > Why wasn't this done before the switch? > > I mean i've stated around like hundreds of times i'm the i18n maintainer and > there is a i18n mailing list, there's no message about you needing help in > none of the mailboxes.
Yep your 100% correct. I apologize. >> And perhaps scripty isn't able to deal with a read-only directory? It >> might need to be deleted instead I suppose. > > From a architectural pov i'd prefer it to me deleted/moved otherwise people > will still think it's the primary place for development. Well this makes sense to me too. I'm not sure why it was decided to be made read only instead, probably just in-case there was a need to make it writable for some hours again if the transition screwed up (which happened). Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
