On Thursday 12 November 2009 3:56:41 pm Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Quinta-feira 12. Novembro 2009, às 21.08.50, Albert Astals Cid escreveu: > > AFAIK pre-commit are > > acltest.pl: ACL, can possibly be done with gitorious admininstraion > > IIRC, there are two ACLs of relevance: > kde-www -> can be solved by usual Gitorious repository administration
Also, last I heard kde-www wasn't moving to gitorious, but staying in svn. Anyone have strong feelings for/against this? > > kdelibs's SSL certificates -> how many people even know that there's a > limitation for this? It's to prevent backdoors being introduced. This could > be done with a post-commit hook screaming aloud, though. > > > pre-commit.pl: not sure what it does, seems like making sure you don't > > commit things with conflict markers > > Unnecessary with Git. Even though with SVN you still needed to do "svn > resolved" and people still managed to commit conflict markers... > > > test-docbook.pl: checks people don't screw up when commiting to > > kdelibs/kdoctools/docbook > > I don't know about this one. > > > test-eol-style.pl: checks eol is correct > > Hmm... should be unnecessary too, but WIndows somehow manages to come back > and bite us. > > Basically, every file should be committed with LF only. No CRLF file, ever > (or we need a .gitattributes file and checking that in a push hook won't > be easy). > > > test-pofiles.pl: checks po files are valid > > > > If we don't move translations we don't need test-pofiles.pl > > Yep. > _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
