Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Quarta-feira 18. Novembro 2009, às 07.31.50, Riccardo Iaconelli escreveu: >> Mmh... but this is a problem also with SVN, no? > > No. In SVN, if you commit, you're the author.
And in Git, if you merge someone else's code, you're the "author" too. Yes, their name and email address (which could be fake) show up in the history -- but ultimately the developer making the merge is taking responsibility for the code. This isn't any different than with SVN, where a developer commits a patch and credits a name and email address, both of which may be fakes/temporary. From a policy/accountability perspective I don't see how this is really different from SVN. --Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
