I have been away for a week for rather sad family reasons, and I've only just now caught up with kde-scm-interest. It seems to me that the whole thing has derailed again, mainly through discussions on two topics:
* accountability * module layout As for the first, wouldn't it be sufficient to have a precommit hook that forces all commits to have a line that says "approved-by: [email protected]" (or something like that, bikeshed about that to your hearts content) where [email protected] is the email address of the kde committer who takes responsibility for the merge? Having a separate administration seems fragile to me. As for module layout, couldn't we just vote or something? It's something we can go on discussing for ages without getting to any resolution, and for modules like kdenetwork or edu, the idea was to ask the people working on that whether they want to stay together or split up anyway, and to me Thiago's numbers about kdelibs vs Qt seem convincing enough. I'd really want to get back to getting things done... -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
