Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Sexta-feira 11. Dezembro 2009, às 00.29.59, Chani escreveu: >> On December 10, 2009 15:13:44 Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> Em Quinta-feira 10. Dezembro 2009, às 18.09.14, Jeff Mitchell escreveu: >>>>> We aren't going to switch to Gitorious with the current merge request >>>>> situation. Its a blocker. Still a blocker. >>>> Why is it a blocker? >>> Why is it a showstopper to not have a feature we didn't have in SVN? >> because svn doesn't email you every project's merge requests (since it >> doesn't *have* merge requests, but that's besides the point). >> imagine if suddenly reviewboard started sending all the mail it currently >> sends to mailing lists and directly-involved people to every person who has >> an svn account. > > Reviewboard isn't SVN. That's completely unrelated here, because Reviewboard > can work with Git too. > > What I don't understand is how we consider a showstopper to not have a > feature > we currently don't have either way. Just don't turn on the feature of sending > merge request notifications by email and we'll have the same situation as we > have with SVN.
Right. This discussion flip-flopped in a weird way, because now you're complaining about blocker behavior that's quite different than what Ian was complaining about. He was complaining that now it's too hard to get merge requests -- you're complaining that it's too hard *not* to get them. The latter problem is most certainly solved. --Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
