On Tuesday 26. January 2010 11.51.38 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > >2) From a marketing perspective, we'd like to start marketing the > > >various KDE applications independently, which requires that they are > > >easier to obtain as stand-alone apps. In other words, we'd like to be > > >able to offer a download of Okular by itself, for instance, since > > >Okular is good enough to sell itself. > > > > > > I fail to see how this requires different tarballs. They still get > > released all together with KDE SC. How does marketing affect the > > tarball used? Or git repo used. > > > > well, quite frankly, i was recently rather pissed off by that just > configuring kdeutils (to build kcalc and nothing more) required me to > install a full-blown kdepimlibs (or hacking the cmake files). don't you > think that there is something wrong with that?
Completely orthogonal; the problem you describe has to do with bad dependency checking for compile, not about splitting up sources you get. KDEPimLibs has some configuration issues for sure, I especially like the KDEPIM_ONLY_KLEO cmake variable ;) This topic is closed for me, really, we closed it before, no new info has been brought to the table. -- Thomas Zander _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
