On Friday 29 January 2010 17:54:28 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > 2010/1/29 ComputerDruid <[email protected]>: > > > So basically I'm missing what action you need to do across the whole > > > of KDE that isn't a "get everything" or "update everything". > > this statement doesn't give the impression that you read the rest of this > and other recent threads on this list ...
I have, but that doesn't mean I remember, or that I associated it with this. It wouldn't hurt to give an example. > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 07:12:27PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > As I said before, IMHO the need for something like 'svn externals' > > should be fulfilled in git (i. e. adding a new subcommand to the git > > suite, not creating our own command). > > ack > > in particular, the idea to make a simple replacement is incredibly > naive. such things don't stay simple. ever. I'm afraid of this, but I still believe it's possible that the community could realize the need to keep it the same and do so. This plan does depend on that, though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
