On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Dmitry Suzdalev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 12 February 2010 17:33:23 Esben Mose Hansen wrote: >> Could someone spell out to me why moving parts like KOffice to git hinders >> (or helps) anything? The only argument I've heard is that using 2 tools >> raises the bat for developers, but since KOffice development is unlikely >> to need changes to kdelibs, I don't see this is applicable here. > It does indirectly. As I've said I think this man power could be spent on > helping whole KDE SC switch to git and after that switching KOffice would be a > breeze (theoretically).
I don't see how anyone could claim that the KOffice folks haven't made an honest faith effort to move all of KDE to git. They've devoted time and resources. _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
