A Dimarts, 16 de febrer de 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen va escriure: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:01:44AM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote: > > On Monday 15. February 2010 23.50.56 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > > The thing is that i don't see consensus *at all*. > > > > > > so? by suppressing the offer you make sure that there won't be any. > > > > Calm down, > > i'm pretty much always calm. ;) > > > Albert is not suppressing anything. > > no - he doesn't have the power to. luckily. his well-known, uhm, > paranoia regarding *any* kind of external control justifies the > assumption that he would become active if he had the means to. it's > people like him who ensured that the TWG had no chance to succeed in the > first place (ultimately it failed for other reasons, so i don't blame > anyone). > > > He is just explaining the already existing rules to you. > > oh, thanks. as if i didn't know them ... > > > There is zero reason to include him in the equation for hiring a dev. > > That you do so anyway just makes you look like you are attacking him > > personally for disagreeing with you. > > i'm attacking not him, but his POV. i'm doing that with the purpose of > exposing his fallacy, so others don't fall for it.
Yes, i'm evil :-) Albert > _______________________________________________ > Kde-scm-interest mailing list > Kde-scm-interest@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
