On Tuesday 2. March 2010 23.07.38 Andreas Pakulat wrote: > But Aaron's example about amarok is pretty weak, > there are tools out there (kdesvn-build anyone?) that take care of > updating and building what you want to follow, no need for manually > tracking a git repository.
So you are saying I should switch to use kdesvn-build instead of what I've been using for the last so many years? Thats not much different than saying "Its just one more tool, how hard can it be!"... As I said in my other mail, its about it being different. If you argue that it has a very minimal impact, I can follow that. It doesn't excuse the moving early either, IMO. But moving something that now lives in kde svn to gitorious as a git repo most certainly falls under the things pointed out. The idea of "no man left behind" just is pretty black and white. I'm not saying you can't do it, I have no illusions that I can yield that kind of power. I'm saying its just not very KDE of you if you do. -- Thomas Zander _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
