Em Quarta-feira 12 Maio 2010, às 15:34:23, Ian Monroe escreveu: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Esben Mose Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 21:29:47 Jeff Mitchell wrote: > >> This all said, we discussed a few alternatives in #kde-git and I was > > > >> asked to put them on this list for discussion: > > I know this is probably a stupid question, but since I can't see the > > answer, perhaps other can't either. As far as I can see, we need > > > > 1. Actual git repositories > > 2. User access controls > > 3. Merge requests/reviewboard > > 4. A bug tracking system > > > > How about the really simple solution of git + ssh + unix groups, and > > patching reviewboard to support git, while keeping bugzilla as is? While > > nowhere near as fancy, it seems a robust solution with minimal impact > > and maintenance, where the only hard part would be the reviewboard > > patching. There, a simple solution could be a social control, where > > non-trivial patches are not pushed until reviewboarded, but are > > otherwise pushed in the normal git-push fashion? If we wanted to be > > fancy, we could have a sign-off SHA or URI in the commit message, which > > could even be required. > > On top of git + ssh + unix group you need some administrative tools to > handle user creation and management of hundreds of users. Thats what > Gitolite does.
We also need repositories connected to wikis. I don't like that the playground
today is a mess of stuff no one knows about.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
