Em Terça-feira 05 Outubro 2010, às 10:38:19, Thomas Zander escreveu: > In svn there is a usability bug that if you delete an application its > terribly hard to find out which revision the deletion happened in. To get > around this problem in KDE we first had a wiki page with the name and then > the revision number of the deletion. > Unfortunately the task of writing the full url for that checkout was still > to obscure and even the experts needed to think a while coming up with > the magick checkout line. > So in the end we got the current solution; which is to move code to an > 'unmaintained' repo. > > In git this problem totally goes away; an application inside a module like > kdeedu can easily be tracked down in the history and revived (it even > doesn't cause the repo to get bigger). > Likewise, as you probably noticed, you don't delete or move at all when > using the split approach as that makes no sense.
That doesn't include the case of a full-module delete.
So we'll still have a class of modules in the "unmaintained" state. But that's
something outside of the repository, not inside.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
Qt Developer Days 2010 - Munich Oct 11-13 - San Francisco Nov 1-3
For more information and to register: http://qt.nokia.com/qtdevdays2010
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
