On Saturday 06 November 2010, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > On Saturday 06 November 2010 12.50.34 Tom Albers wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:49, Torgny Nyblom <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > kdepimlibs will be kdepimlibs in git as well. > > > > It would make sense to split kdepimlibs though. > > > > They are already fully independent and it would make it more > > attractive to be used by others. > > > > Pimlibs is considered as a big monolitic library blob, while that > > is not true. Especially in the mobile world it would be good to > > have a set of small separate libraries, and in fact that is what > > pimlibs is.. It would make the individual bits of pimlibs more > > attractive to use by apps. > > > > I'ld advise to split pimlibs. > > Would that mean each lib on it's own or?
Yes, that's what Tom suggests. Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
