On Sunday 05 December 2010 05:30:53 Ian Monroe wrote:
> I've done a trial run of a kdelibs git conversion and published it here:
> http://gitweb.kde.org/scratch/ianmonroe/kdelibs-test.git
> It should have a fairly comprehensive history thanks to Torgny Nyblom
> trackModule.pl script. Feedback appreciated.
> 
> The plan is do the git conversion at the same time kdepim does, on Dec
> 20th.
> 
> One question is whether we want to have a separate 'history' repo,
> like what Amarok has. It is used to store inactive branches. The size
> savings for the main repo probably isn't much, but it does clean up
> the 'git branch -a' list. Another issue is what the Kate folks are
> planning, though I don't believe it should affect the git conversion.
Given kate history is small, I doubt it makes a big difference now to drop it 
in this repo.

Just convert whole kdelibs/base, later the dirs can still just be removed (if 
consense reached). having history intact for kdelibs.

Greetings
Christoph
_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest

Reply via email to