On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 06:22:38PM -0600, Ian Monroe wrote: > The branches (especially the early CVS ones) are a bit confused, this > is a work-in-progress.
> cvs2svn has some known issues I think, > that's to put it mildly. one could also say that it monumentally screwed up entire branches, probably most of them (i wonder how you approached that?). a more reliable way would be probably doing a "naive" cvs2svn conversion (which does not consider server-side moves) with a current version and then fix up the history (remove the ghost files) with svn2git min revision rules. of course that would mean that all rules before the the old revision would have to be re-adjusted ... but well, i'm not saying anything new here, so whatever. _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
