> I read your mail and sincerely it seemed like "we screwed up with those > libs and don't know what yo do, help!". Since i know nothing about git I > can't help.
I dont think we screwed up. Rules are written and repos look quite good. We dont need help, I just want to talk about those libraries which we write, need, maintain, and share. > If you ask what is my personal opinion as Okular maintainer > i'd prefer a non split repo. Well, we went for a non-split repo with digikam et al and the answer from sysadmins was pretty clear (monolithic a no-go). I've seen different opinions on this list, but I can now, technically, only agree with the split-repo approach: Why should one who wants to code a patch for gwenview or libksane have to download okular's full history? Remember that git is a bit different to SVN in that respect. > > Have you contacted the module coordinator in the release-team [1]? > http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Release_Team Well, that's Aaron officially. But I'd also like to have input from this list, I guess here are the people who oversee the migration process. Marcel _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
