In <[email protected]>, Johannes Sixt wrote: >In my book, a "nice" history is not when it is a linear string of changes, >but rather when each commit represents a good (well tested) project state. >If, after a rebase, you test only the tip commit, but not the N-1 other >rebased commits, you do not conform to this definition of "nice".
I didn't know j6t was a fan of KDE. I haven't heard from you since I left the git mailing list. I agree with your definition of a good history, but git does no favors by automatically committing merges. The merge is another state and needs to be tested before it is actually committed. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [email protected] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
