Nicolas Alvarez wrote: > Ian Monroe wrote: >> I've only done a basic look over on each repo (looked at branches, >> made sure each only had one parentless commit), plan on doing more >> tonight. But really it helps to know the history of the code to know >> if everything looks right. Also if folks could do build tests that >> would be helpful. >> >> The repos are dated from the 13th or so. >> >> You can see them under scratch/ianmonroe at http://quickweb.kde.org > > I reviewed kturtle and found some problems, but they are now fixed in the > conversion rules.
Kig reviewed. Everything is fine, except for a missing feature branch merge (make_kdeedu_cool -> trunk) that could be added later. Marble reviewed. Some documentation history was missing, I added it to the rules. Like in Kig, there is a missing branch merge (marble-geodata-nt). -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
