On 16.02.11 00:12:16, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Hi, > > I've added a section for proposed workflows. I think eean wants to create a > couple of proposals too. > > http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda#Proposed_workflows > > Please poke holes in mine and let me know if something just won't work in > it: > > http://community.kde.org/20110213_GitWorkflowAgenda/StevesIdea
Whats missing in that idea is why rebasing all the time should be better than merge'ing? Also your proposal creates a purely linear history in master, which means you're completely loosing the information that certain commits belonged to a topic-branch. This may be useful in some cases when looking at history as one can easily discard a whole sequence of commits easily by seeing they're coming in through a merge from a topic-branch. Andreas -- Today is the first day of the rest of the mess. _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
