On Thursday 21 April 2011 21.25.13 Ian Monroe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:56, Stefan Majewsky > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what is the technical procedure for moving libtagaro.git to kdereview? > > I think sysadmins need be informed, and hope that those are reading > > here. > > > > Assuming that this goes well: I hereby propose to move libtagaro to > > the kdegames module after the usual review period. For the time being, > > because kdegames has not yet moved from SVN, this would create a > > module that is split between SVN and Git, but a similar situation > > exists with kdegraphics, so I hope this is not a problem. In any > > event, scm-interest is CCd if anyone wants to discuss this. > > This doesn't make sense to me. If you want to be part of kdegames, you > should join it where it is. If I were you I would just hold off. > > It's way too confusing to split modules between VCS systems and I > don't think it should be allowed (*cough* kdegraphics *cough*).
+1 a module is a unit and should be treated as such even if the different apps are in different gits. /Regards Torgny _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
