> On March 25, 2011, 1:30 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > main-widget.cpp, line 379
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100838/diff/4/?file=12746#file12746line379>
> >
> >     I think the comment "fall Through" is in the wrong place.
> >     
> >     I initially read this as expecting ConnectionStatusDisconnected to fall 
> > through, which clearly it doesn't.
> 
> Martin Klapetek wrote:
>     So it should be one line down? I'm used to write comments above the 
> lines, so that's why it might be off.

It could just be a personal style thing.

I'm used to writing

switch(foo) {
 case A:
    break;
 case B: /*Fall Through*/
 case C:
    break;
}

so it's clear that B is meant to fall through and doesn't accidentally having a 
missing break. 

I'm not too fussed


> On March 25, 2011, 1:30 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > main-widget.cpp, line 377
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100838/diff/4/?file=12746#file12746line377>
> >
> >     If you need to manually invalidate your filter you have something wrong 
> > with either your model or the filter code.
> 
> Martin Klapetek wrote:
>     This is the case I described above - this is a slot called when the 
> account connection state changes. When it gets disconnected, the filtering 
> needs to be invalidated to 'refilter' the items, therefore this is called 
> here. See the docs for QSortFilterProxyModel::invalidateFilter() - "This 
> function should be called if you are implementing custom filtering (e.g. 
> filterAcceptsRow()), and your filter parameters have changed." - This is 
> exactly the case.

I'm not convinced. You haven't changed the filter - you're still filtering out 
offline accounts, therefore the filter parameters haven't changed.

When the model emits dataChanged() it should automatically call 
filterAcceptsRow();
If you need something outside the model to monitor for changes and poke the 
filter, it seems to defeat the point of it. 

I'll try taking a look. If I can make it work without it, then we remove it. 
Otherwise it clearly needs to stay.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100838/#review2132
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 23, 2011, 9:32 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100838/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 23, 2011, 9:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Telepathy.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This is the work that begun in my clone repo and has matured enough now to be 
> merged back to 'upstream', where the work should continue now.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 2c62ea10556cdba38d1bca0fe63603df97414336 
>   account-button.h PRE-CREATION 
>   account-button.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   account-filter-model.h PRE-CREATION 
>   account-filter-model.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   accounts-model-item.h PRE-CREATION 
>   accounts-model-item.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   accounts-model.h PRE-CREATION 
>   accounts-model.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-delegate-overlay.h PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-delegate-overlay.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-delegate.h PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-delegate.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-model-item.h PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-model-item.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-overlays.h PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-overlays.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-view-hover-button.h PRE-CREATION 
>   contact-view-hover-button.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   filter-bar.h PRE-CREATION 
>   filter-bar.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   main-widget.h aed6f7c8336321bc8a6ffb3b9af6b1d493f85790 
>   main-widget.cpp 6146b62eec17b54be63b594200613931673ac5fe 
>   main-widget.ui 5b0d5aaaf3a4e2f49eb030b98b15fcae3a86170c 
>   main.cpp bba0e4175e8853afe603f26ea4707f4974192d0f 
>   ontologies/CMakeLists.txt 3e0bbe8c634908f689dcd360409aeddcc6fc0d23 
>   tree-node.h PRE-CREATION 
>   tree-node.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100838/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> We did a lot of thourough testing on #kde-telepathy, also some people emailed 
> their reports which all has been fixed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE-Telepathy mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy

Reply via email to