> On April 12, 2011, 1:28 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Code is fine (except a minor comment below).
> > 
> > I'm still not 100% convinced by your design for presence stuff, and how it 
> > interacts with 3rd parties changing the presence. However I'll wait till 
> > it's finished before judging.
> >

Any hints for improvement? ;)


> On April 12, 2011, 1:28 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > main-widget.h, line 89
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101104/diff/1/?file=14218#file14218line89>
> >
> >     Does this really need to be public?
> >     
> >     In general make things protected/private unless there's actually a 
> > reason to make it public.

The idea is to be able to trigger this slot by eventual config interface 
(pressing Apply in the dialog).


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101104/#review2581
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 12, 2011, 1:10 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101104/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 12, 2011, 1:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Telepathy.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This patch saves the presence message so it stays when you reopen the contact 
> list.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   main-widget.h 18f97ee 
>   main-widget.cpp 7fe200c 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101104/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Status message set, app reopened, status message still present
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KDE-Telepathy mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy

Reply via email to