Maybe if we just offset by a week or two?
2012/1/26 Martin Klapetek <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 14:30, David Edmundson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I personally think (in retrospect having seen what happened at 0.1, >> 0.2 and 0.3) that releasing in sync with KDE has more downsides than >> good. >> >> Our news tends to get drowned out by the massive "KDE 4.8", when we >> released 0.2 it seemed we got more buzz the other 2 times. I guess >> there were more exciting features too, but I think this is a >> contributing factor. Also promo people, translation people and >> packagers are far busier sorting out the important main release. >> >> 0.4 is set for ~April, but it's definitely something to think about >> when planning 0.5. > > > I agree. Our dot article is also intentionally delayed so that 4.8 can be on > top for a while (I was informed) and media do not really pick our > announcement up. The question is if we still intend to be part of KDE SC > itself (ie. following SC release cycle etc). Then we'd be in that > announcement anyway. > > This release schedule also plays nicely with distro releases. Now they have > lots of time to package us and include in the main repos (as most of them > are released in April/May and October/November). Should we release after > their release, we'd be available only in user repos (which is still better > than nothing). > > -- > Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer > > >> >> >> Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> KDE-Telepathy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy > > > > _______________________________________________ > KDE-Telepathy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy > _______________________________________________ KDE-Telepathy mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy
