On Monday, September 16, 2013 10:05:26 AM Allen Winter wrote: > On Monday, September 16, 2013 03:56:47 PM Daniel Vrátil wrote: > > On Sunday 15 of September 2013 00:40:21 David Edmundson wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > We're planning on making a release of libkpeople next week *. We've > > > been fixing all problems we know of in the main model, and we're ready > > > to optionally use it from within KTp. > > > > > > It doesn't have everything promised/needed for a final release and > > > some parts I am definitely not happy with code-wise. However, > > > development has really stagnated. If we don't release it soon it is in > > > danger of becoming abandonware. Us using it should hopefully drive > > > development enough to make it PIM-ready. > > > > > > We don't have API or even source code stability, but given it's called > > > 0.1 and in playground and being uploaded to the unstable folder no-one > > > should really expect that. (right?) > > > > > > Any objections from your side? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > KPeople is an awesome technology and I don't think that API instability is > > an > > issue, especially when this is released as a tech preview (and with a big > > red > > blinking warning "unstable" :-) ), so no objections from my side. > > > > I'm using KPeople-enabled build of KTp and it works pretty well there too, > > so > > it's probably not that bad with source instability either :) > > > Then how about we shoot for getting libkeople included with kdepimlibs 4.12? > So let's get it into playground as soon as possible. Where we can do a > cleaning > and thorough API review. Then move it to kdepimlibs in short order. > Technically, First to playground then to kde-review then to kdepimlibs
_______________________________________________ KDE-Telepathy mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy
