Hi, > I would say if it uses a license which is non-existing/invalid, that > should be enough to warrant a change by us, no? But, IANAL.
Should we pester kde-licensing? Or maybe just ask d_ed, as I think he recruited the student. > In the same thread from May this year, both Dan and David agreed > to have their stuff relincesed to whatever, so I'd just make it all > LGPLv2.1+, which is what we've all agreed back in time (can't > find any references though). I remember that. I just posted a reviewboard request relicensing all of the KTp/Logger stuff. to LGPL-2.1+. Diane _______________________________________________ KDE-Telepathy mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy
