On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, James Daniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday, January 29, 2017 11:00:38 PM MST Aleix Pol wrote: > > Hi James, > > Do all these messages mean that you'll take over KDE Telepathy > > maintainrship as Martin suggested? > > > > I'd say that Telepathy KDE needs more than just refactoring on the > > presence code. > > > > Aleix > > I was hoping to get the Presence stuff worked out and avoid the > maintainership, actually. I don't know if a freeze on git commits until > a maintainer is found is sensible, but there is also still some opposition > by > Martin as to what the Presence portion of KTp currently up for review on > ReviewBoard doesn't just do away with completely. > My opposition is that you're pushing for highly complicated architecture that is hard to understand and it complicates simple things incredibly. There *will* be bugs (you yourself have updated the RRs so many times already) and there will be *nobody* to look after those bugs and solve them. I don't want to introduce unnecessary complexity into code that nobody will maintain. That would just be irresponsible. Cheers -- Martin Klapetek
