Hi, On Friday 05 November 2010, Patrick Spendrin wrote: > Also we invested quite some time into this, which would be totally > useless if we chose to stay with one compiler.
just for clarification (once again): I do not advocate changing anything about compiler support in emerge. I can absolutely see the merit of having several compilers, there. I do advocate changing something about the end-user side of things, i.e. the KDE windows installer. And of course about the barriers towards creating a release. > The compiler discussion is old already, and it won't be solved any time > soon. So let's try to focus on the other problems first. Yeah, I know, I'm late to the party. But BTW, if I'm not mistaken this is another example of a discussion that should have been had on the list, instead of behind the scenes. Anyway, so what about the more moderate variant of my suggestion: Chop the installer (and release) into different *independent* incarnations, one for each compiler. At least it would make it easier to break up the monumental task of creating a release into something more managable. Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-windows mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows
