On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Thomas Friedrichsmeier < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > I would personally suggest kde-4.8 as that should be the most reliable in > > my opinion. > > YMMV, but keep in mind that as branches are cooling down, things (esp. > download targets) may start to break again. In fact, earlier on in my > latest > emerge adventures, I had given kde-4.8 a short try, based on similar > reasoning. IIRC, that failed at downloading perl. A cursory glance suggests > that perl would indeed be a 404 on kde-4.8 > (f9d83f7dd282320fe9d57c7616d2e3113d92ba6d is candidate for cherry-picking, > here; see its commit message). We've just discussed jom, and now I second- > checked it in a browser: jom is no longer to be found on > ftp://ftp.qt.nokia.com/. > We would need to fix those anyway as that is the last release. There are bugs everywhere, and I am sure there will be bugs in 4.9 not even considered. Still, I would consider a stable branch for newcomers, and fix the problem appearing. It is better to have less, but more stable branches now and also in the future in my opinion. Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Kde-windows mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows
