Hi Thomas, I wanted to request a craft specific ml before but the valid argument was brought up that we would loose basically everyone already subscribed and it would be quite lonely on that ml for a while. It would also mean that I'd need to do a bad job in moderating two ml's instead of just one... But yes you are completely correct, the windows ml feels a bit wrong.
Cheers, Hannah ________________________________ From: Kde-windows on behalf of Thomas Friedrichsmeier Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2022 21:04 To: kde-windows@kde.org Cc: caulier.gil...@gmail.com Subject: A craft mailinglist? Was: [Craft] [Bug 457185] Craft digiKam MacOS : libgphoto2 packaging problem. Am Wed, 27 Jul 2022 06:49:18 +0000 schrieb "Hannah von Reth" <bugzilla_nore...@kde.org>: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457185 [...] > Btw, > This is the craft bug tracker, not stackoverflow or a mailing list. > Cheers, > > Hannah I'll take this as an opportunity to mention that I have often thought craft may need a dedicated mailing list? It has long since out-grown its Windows-only days. Posting to kde-windows really does feel a bit misplaced when discussing problems with AppImages or APKs. Also, at times I have some unfinished thoughts on craft itself that are too involved for chat, but also don't quite translate into issues or merge requests. Last not least, where, other than chat, would (usage) problems with binary-factory infrastructure be discussed? Does anybody else see a need for this? And maybe calling it something like "kde-build" would even encourage more synergy with kde-buildsrc? Regards Thomas
