Kevin Krammer posted on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:58:48 +0200 as excerpted: > The copy I received was a proper multi-part message. Your client should > have preferred the plain text version if that is your setup preference. > Mine did.
My client presented both the text/plain and the text/html parts, both as raw text as it doesn't parse the HTML as such at all, treating it exactly as it does text/plain (the safest policy for handling HTML, after all), one below the other. That's why I said "the HTML portion". But the HTML portion need not be sent at all, because that's simply an invitation to malware and spyware probing, and if HTML is needed to make the point, the point isn't worth making in the first place. If HTML is appropriate, there's an appropriate place for it, a web page. And an appropriate way to pass that in an email message, as a standard URL, which can be loaded in the user's browser of choice or not, as they choose. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
