On Monday 15 December 2008 08.39:36 Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote: > As kdenlive is clearly very much a GUI program major parts of kdenlive can > not be unittested. However, some parts can. Right now I would like to > create a unit test for part of the KdenliveDoc::convertDocument() function. > I am capable of doing this, but would like to know beforehand if it would > be OK with all? (Especially JB, I reckon).
I have absolutely no experience in unit tests, but I admit that it would be great to have an automated way to check the loading / saving of documents whenever some changes are made to the kdenlive document format. > Also, what framework to use? I have experience with ccpunit and boost, but > I reckon QtTestLib would be better to use for Kdenlive? > http://developer.kde.org/documentation/tutorials/writingunittests/writingun >ittests.html Yes, the QtTestLib is probably a better choice if it's ok for you to look at it. Regards jb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Kdenlive-devel mailing list Kdenlive-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
