I don't know if it's a good way, and why 2.0 and not 1.0 ??
In my way, I think a lot of users use kdenlive 0.5 and 0.6 cause they use
old distribution (hardy, feisty ...).
Certainly, they want to keep their version of distrib. And actually, it
don't exist a complete package it install all dependancies of kdenlive
0.7.1 .
For example, i had Ubuntu Studio Hardy to do MAO, but i love Kdenlive too.
But i never can install this new version with this distrib...
2009/1/26 Jean-Michel Pouré <[email protected]>
> A lot of users are complaining that Kdenlive 0.5 or 0.6 is not working.
> They don't understand that Kdenlive 0.7 is a complete rewrite. Should we
> rename Kdenlive 0.7.2 to Kdenlive 2.0? What do you think?
>
> Kind regards,
> Jean-Michel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Kdenlive-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
