Alberto Villa wrote: > On Monday 07 November 2011 00:45:10 jb wrote: >> Great! At first I wanted to make it 0.8.2.1, but the changes will be more >> important than first thought... with at least 6-7 severe bug fixes. That's >> why I thought 0.8.4 would be more appropriate. >> >> Anyways, I don't really care about these version's number, so if you think >> 0.8.2.1 is better it's ok for me, as long as I manage to fix these issues. > Not important at all. And your opinion on 0.8.4 makes sense. ;) To my opinion 0.8.2.1 would be more appropriate to state that 0.8.2 is not perfectly stable, and needs an upgrade without additional features, even if code changes are not so light... If I wanted to select an "old-stable" release I would take this into account. Usually incrementing he "second significant digit" implies new features, don't you think ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Kdenlive-devel mailing list Kdenlive-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
