On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 22:11 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote: > - less infrastructure maintainance > - more likely participation of developers that have a KDE SVN account > already > - code review, a lot of people follow commits and review patches (no > promise, > it's just more likely due to increased visibility) > - can be released alongside KDE (whereever it ends up, even extragear) > - integration of SVN with bugtracker > - translation done be KDE translation teams (manpower, consistency > across > desktop) > - shows stronger KDE ties, taking a bit more advantage of KDE's brand > - the ebn, people doing roaming fixes, etc."
Everyone agrees that active developers are needed. I see no problem in moving to KDE svn after a first collaboration and active help are received. Witouth any prior help, I can only feel this is a political offer. Also, I was a KDE 2 user a long time ago and I still don't understand KDE's choice to look like Windows. Take the example of Amarok, this once beautiful software now looks horrible. Are the choices of users really taken into account by KDE members and developers? Another example: this mail was forwarded to our mailing list. Did the developers take the time to register our mailing list? Will they really help? I doubt. Help us first, then we move, this my personal answer. Kind regards, Jean-Michel
