On Monday 15 December 2008 08.39:36 Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote: > As kdenlive is clearly very much a GUI program major parts of kdenlive can > not be unittested. However, some parts can. Right now I would like to > create a unit test for part of the KdenliveDoc::convertDocument() function. > I am capable of doing this, but would like to know beforehand if it would > be OK with all? (Especially JB, I reckon).
I have absolutely no experience in unit tests, but I admit that it would be great to have an automated way to check the loading / saving of documents whenever some changes are made to the kdenlive document format. > Also, what framework to use? I have experience with ccpunit and boost, but > I reckon QtTestLib would be better to use for Kdenlive? > http://developer.kde.org/documentation/tutorials/writingunittests/writingun >ittests.html Yes, the QtTestLib is probably a better choice if it's ok for you to look at it. Regards jb
