What are you recording? BTW, its not just "buggy", its simply doesnt work for me at all. And even if i record manually with ffmpeg from command line the quality is very bad and the frames lag(a problem with recording sound and video into a container format), definitely it is not my computer that is the issue, it is the code of ffmpeg. For now kdenlive is unmerged due to kdenlive depending on kdelibs semantic-desktop
Live long and prosper, Christ-Jan Wijtmans https://github.com/cjwijtmans http://facebook.com/cj.wijtmans http://twitter.com/cjwijtmans On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Evert Vorster <evorster at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Christ-Jan > > Just because certain features don't work for you does not mean it does > not work for everybody. I found the recording features in kdenlive > quite useful, and far better than the alternatives that I have tried. > I would prefer that Kdenlive keeps the capability of recording from > cameras and the desktop. Granted, the recording feature is a little > buggy, but not impossibly so. I found that the main instability comes > from Kdenlive allowing me to set resolutions and frame rates not > supported by the hardware. Generally if you get the correct resolution > and framerate, recording works well. > > As for contradiction in my statement, I don't see it. > Removing code is as bad as putting code in. There is simply no > guarantee that kdenlive will become more stable by removing code. > Precisely because the release code is so complicated is a good enough > reason to leave the features in as some other part of the program > might rely on a part of that feature that might not even be exported > to the UI. > > I have seen many times that just fixing a small bug introduces a few > more bugs in different places in kdenlive. > If you don't like a feature, just don't use that feature. Nothing > could be more simple. > > Hopefully the refactor will be completed and then removing or adding > code will be a much more simple process. I agree that plugins in > respect with the refactored code would probably be a good idea. > However the base functionality in the refactor first needs to be > replicated, and that might still take a while. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20131127/764f2fa5/attachment.html>
